Skip to content

The GeoSpatial Foursquare obligation

2013 June 8

Explore what is around you

Foursquare is an app which helps you explore what is around you, share your location with friends and/or contribute to better points-of-interest. By checking in at locations, Foursquare lets you collect points. You can become the mayor of a venue if you check-in often enough, that is when you check-in more than others do. Off course there is no real obligation to use Foursquare, but I am making an exception for geographers, or those working in the GeoSpatial world. They should at least have an opinion about the hyperlocal world and apps like Foursquare, and a good way to gain understanding is to give it a try yourself. This blogpost is just a short résumé of my personal Foursquare experience and it may be of help as well.

The participation puzzle
As social media networks can be quite puzzling, I have channeled my participation and contributions into separate channels (this may require a separate blogpost). My Foursquare “friends” (connections would be more appropriate) are -real- people I have met and share a similar work environment with: the GeoSpatial world or the world of modern maps if you will. This does e.g. exclude friends in the Dutch sense, I keep them in my Facebook world. Every now and then I go through my list of connections and disconnect the inactive ones. Although I never insist on reciprocity, maintaining a lurking connection does not make sense to me.

I do not care much about the mayorships or the points I gather, but the awards are sometimes surprisingly rewarding. And a remark like ‘you have not been in a harbour since San Diego’, ‘welcome back to Italy’ or ‘You were here just five months ago’ is good for a digital smile. When you receive a “Nerd Alert”, after checking in at 25 different book stores, you know Foursquare clearly gets your spatial profile.

Occasionally I will share my Foursquare check-in with my Facebook friends, just to let them know where I am at. At times I will do the same with Twitter, just to show my appreciation to Foursquare and to all my weak social ties, and beyond.

you know Foursquare clearly gets your spatial profile

Benefits
If actions must have benefits and -just fun- does not suffice, checking in -and seeing others do the same- has the benefit of a higher spatial consciousness: you feel spatially connected to friends at places, where you actually are not yourself. At times we happen to be physically close to one another, which has led to an occasional extra cup of coffee at a railway station. Feeling spatially connected is a big payoff for spatial thinkers.

Foursquare surves as a personal spatial diary (where was that restaurant we went to last year) and one you can easily share with your friends. Checking in at locations can have pecuniary benefits as well. I have enjoyed free drinks and discounts on dinners (I am very Dutch) by checking into venues. Sometimes I just forget to claim the discount, but at least I had an interesting dinner conversation.

Since my Foursquare connections have solved the social media puzzle in a different way, I see people check in at their grandmothers house, their own home (it should not be too difficult to become the mayor of that), the birthday party of their children, a mix of all of the above. It is the ‘double fun’ aspect of foursquare.

A big benefit to geographers is contributing to a better map of the world. That means also reporting when venues have moved or when they are in the wrong position. I do that occasionally, should do that more often. In case you wonder: the wisdom of the crowd is not at work within Foursquare, since users influence each other when they check-in. Independent check-ins (e.g. not seeing popular venues or venues with existing users) would be needed for that (see James Surowiecki).

Privacy
It seems any discussion on the use of social media brings the privacy topic to the table and rightfully so. Citizens have different levels of trust towards firms and governments and this trust varies from country to country as well. That trust will be nullified in case of a security breach. One of the reasons for me to use different social media channels is that the thought of entrusting all my data to one corporation is not very comforting to me, however benign that corporation presents itself.

Foursquare cares about the privacy of its users and the policy seems solid. Tips you give on Foursquare are publicly accessible, when you upload photos you are offered on open to the world / only for your network option. Foursquare has a ‘private’ option, meaning your check-in will not be disclosed to your connections, just to you and Foursquare. There are also settings available related to your visibility in your network or to the owners of a venue.

My check-ins are mostly geographically correct, meaning I am actually at that location. But I do think twice before checking in at a location, selectively revealing where I am at. If the real location is possibly problematic (e.g. the office of a prospect), I will just check-in at a nearby station. The real privacy option in Foursquare is off course not checking in at all, ever (paraphrasing Eric Schmidt..).

4sqrdam

Nice cartography courtesy of MapBox with a litte help from the great OpenStreetMap community

So what about the Foursquare obligation*?

My main point: the vast amount of spatial data collected, whether voluntary with Fourquare or similar apps, or involuntary, by a trace on your phone, has a huge impact on geographic data at large. This will change the way we make maps in the very near future. If you want to stay abreast of these developments, there is no escape but to experiment and experience it yourself.

Geographers should have some idea about how this kind of data may affect the perfect map. My advice is to try Foursquare out for a fix period of time (e.g. 10 weeks) and consider if the benefit subtracted by the effort is positive. Just contributing to a better map and a better point-of-interest should be worth the Foursquare endeavor. Apart from that, the visualisations based on check-ins are really amazing and it is great to contribute to those as well.

And what I got out of it now: a chance to gather and publish a few thoughts beyond the length of the average tweet (taking Jason Lanier and his “Write a blog post that took weeks of reflection” very serious). Without any obligation and regardless of how many people check into my blog.

*Maybe the title of a movie-to-be, in which case I will not claim the rights to the title once the movie has been released.

 

[note: wrote this before PRISM was revealed..]

Where is the Value of Open Innovation for GeoSpatial*?

2013 May 20

whereisthevalueLast week the GeoSpatial World Forum took place in Rotterdam and I attended the session on GeoSpatial Innovation. I also gave a short presentation on Innovation, Open Innovation, Value and Where (in that order).

 

Innovation

Not new in itself (e.g. the ancient Romans were into innovation) and there are many definitions out there. I use the “an invention brought into common usage” (Conway, Steward, 2009). If you accept this definition, it is remarkable to bring out a new product as being innovate: you have no clue whether it will last or for how long and whether there will be common usage.

I think I said that what is called innovative mostly is not (doesn’t even matter that much which definition you choose; discussions about “true innovation” can be endless and am I am not a fan of those). Innovation does come from the most unexpected aspects of the products and services offered, sometimes others benefit more from your innovation then you do yourself, and sometimes users lead, and some more than others (a good read: Eric von Hippel).

 

Open Innovation

In plain words: “Let others help you with your innovation. In return, help others as well”. Inventing everything yourself and bringing that to market (the older way of innovating) may not be the most optimal from your organisations’ perspective. Hence open innovation can be viewed as an innovation of innovation itself.

I did discuss the “not invented here syndrome” as a challenge to overcome and move towards “proudly found elsewhere”. Some of the OI initiatives I mentioned were Proctor and Gamble, Unilever, DSM, Philips.

 

Value

A difficult topic, as value is often very tacit. Value is also very much context related and not to be confused with price or the €/$ amount you will find on your bill (I think I mentioned that what you really pay for is mostly not on that bill).

Value moves along a value chain and the value you perceive from a product or services is added up along that chain. Aligned value chains greatly enhance the value for all in this system. When organisations have similar value chains, they compete in the market. It can still be interesting to meet, but a business connection is less likely. Value chains that complement each other are opportunities to do business. Over time, value chains have morphed into network and ecosystems of value.

 

ecosystemWhere

So there is value of open innovation to be found in ecosystems, also in the GeoSpatial world. The strength of these ecosystems is determined by factors like continuity, diversity, strength, depth. Openness to external actors like suppliers and users (the most important ones), communities, networks, alliances etc. are important. I did present Innocentive as a example of an intermediary. The way Esri connects to the user community via Ideas.ArcGIS.com is a good example of ideation.

I may have said that Google I/O’s “innovation in the open” actually means “you’re welcome to innovate in our ecosystem” – not that of alternative ecosystems. It was not quite appropriate to mention Geovation here (thank you for the feedback). Geovation is about more data, not just OS, but it does leave out a few resources as well. It is a ‘increasing the size of pie’-tactic: if they pie size increases (more people want to work with maps), there will be more pie for us as well (more people will want those great OS maps!)

 

Final thoughts

Discussions on open innovation tend to focus on value: how can one help one another to create more value. You need to be connected as an organisation to other organisations and be able to reach out to other, complimentary organisations. There is no such thing as 100% open innovation (nor 100% closed). Organisations always need to appropriate some of the joint value in order to continue to exist. But 100% appropriation is not the goal of organisations working with the open innovation framework.

 

How to get started with Open innovation? Chain up with the organisations around you (start with your suppliers and customers), co-create with partners. Start the discussion about what you do not want to share (e.g. our training material) and what you do want to get out of the joint initiatives (e.g. more training business). When you run into resistance to change, try to see that as a good sign.

 

Where is the value of open innovation from Jan Willem van Eck

Maybe this was not the average presentation you expect to find at a “Geo conference”, but nonetheless I had a few interesting questions and conversations afterwards (e.g. how do you prevent your competitors from appropriating, how do you deal with IP, etc). There is a lot of value in meeting up with real people and discussing aspects of open innovation, value creation and value capture!

 

BTW: I missed out on the OSGeo session which took place at the same time as the GeoSpatial Innovation session (when I have to choose between innovation and OSGeo…:) ), I will make it up next time.

 

 

*I am still not a fan of the pleonasm and oxymoron “GeoSpatial”. I am more into Geography of the earth….

 

Geo Verbindt – de overheid

2013 April 21

gin10jaarHet thema van het GIN Congres van aankomende week, 24 en 25 april,  is Geo Verbindt*. Uit de aankondiging : “Verbinding door middel van de geo-discipline in de meeste brede zin van haar betekenis; op gebieden als kennisdeling, (inter-) nationale samenwerking, overheidsbeleid t.a.v. innovatie, commerciële bedrijvigheid en wetenschappelijk onderzoek.”

Wat valt me op? Het programma is wel erg overheidsgericht… dat mag je natuurlijk verwachten als je lezingen organiseert tijdens een beurs die ICT Overheid heet, maar toch… in het programma merk ik alleen maar een verbinding tussen de overheid zelf.

  • Presentatie “De toekomst van de geo-informatieketen”, geheel vanuit de overheid gezien (provincies, gemeenten, rijk). Uitspraken over de toekomst zou ik altijd met een korreltje zout nemen, maar het was hier zeker aardig geweest om ook de visie van de wetenschap en het bedrijfsleven mee te nemen. Of in ieder geval contrasten te bespreken. Hetzelfde geldt voor het onderwerp “BGT: van assemblage tot gebruik”. Naar mijn beeld gebeurt er weinig met de BGT zonder een bredere samenwerking, of je driehoek van samenwerking nu als goud beschouwt, of niet.
GeoYoga - the winners

de ware NeoGeo’s

  • Naast een aantal startende bedrijven (zie NeoGeo, niet mijn favoriete term) staat er geen enkel bedrijf op het podium. Op de beurs staan wel geo-bedrijven – zij die het congres mogelijk maken, lees ervoor betalen -. Nu heb ik altijd gewaakt voor een –ik heb een stand dus mag ik op een podium- regeling. Maar ik zie nu een groot contrast met voorgaande edities van het GIN Congres en ik vraag we af hoe dat zo is gekomen. Hebben alleen overheden iets te vertellen over deze onderwerpen?
  • Hergebruik (re-use) is een redelijk actueel onderwerp met veel mogelijkheden tot innovatie. Hier ziet de Europese Commissie een grote bijdrage van … bedrijven, maar ook zij ontbreken in deze sessie. Terwijl toch juist daar de meerwaarde wordt verwacht. GeoBusiness had hier niet misstaan.

 

 

Het bovenstaande is natuurlijk gewoon uit jaloersheid geschreven. Noch als voormalig voorzitter, noch als voormalig congresorganisator kan ik er dit jaar bij zijn. Ook voor de ledenvergadering heb ik me afgemeld. Bestaande verplichtingen, u kent het (ik mag o.a. naar TheNextWeb, een hele conferentie vol …Neo’s, zo u wilt).

Daarom: gaat allen naar dit congres! Ik hoop op meer dan de 2500 deelnemers  (en meer dan 3000 aanmeldingen) die het Geo-Info Exchange / GIN Congres in 2011 mocht trekken. Ik hoor/lees graag hoe het is het geweest. En nu maar hopen dat het geen technisch weer is tijdens de beursdagen….

 

* niet te verwarren met het thema van GIS Conferentie van 2011: GIS Verbindt.